Cloudways Managed Cloud
Best for: The Lightning Stack is the better choice for most modern WordPress, WooCommerce and Laravel sites on Cloudways: it served about half as many requests again in Cloudways' own uncached load test, costs nothing, and can be switched back. The only real reason to stay on Hybrid is .htaccess. Sites with long .htaccess files, security plugins that write their own rules, or more than 25 redirects should test on a staging copy first, because Lightning ignores .htaccess completely.
- Served 394,437 requests against 255,190 for Hybrid in Cloudways' own uncached 30-minute load test
- Faster WordPress admin and checkout pages, where caching cannot help
- Fewer moving parts, with NGINX and PHP-FPM only
- Switched per application, in bulk or one at a time, with no downtime claimed and the option to switch back
- Web Rules manage redirects and headers from the dashboard, without editing files
- .htaccess files are ignored entirely, along with anything that depends on Apache modules
- Web Rules allow 25 redirect or rewrite rules and 10 header rules per application, each with a single condition
- Custom NGINX configuration is not available as an alternative
- Plugins that write rules into .htaccess for security or browser caching silently stop applying them
- Cloudways' help centre says new applications still default to Hybrid, so you have to switch them yourself
Cloudways Lightning Stack: faster, but check .htaccess first
The Cloudways Lightning Stack drops Apache and Varnish for NGINX alone. What it speeds up, what breaks without .htaccess, Web Rules limits and how to switch.
How we pay for this
We buy the hardware and pay for the subscriptions we write about. Claim a deal through our link and we may earn a commission — our readers sometimes get a discount or a freebie out of it too, but it never pushes the price up, and it never changes what the review says.
The Lightning Stack is a web server set-up on Cloudways that runs NGINX and PHP-FPM alone, replacing the older Hybrid stack of NGINX, Apache and Varnish. It handles uncached requests faster, costs nothing, and is chosen per application. The trade-off is that it ignores .htaccess files, so redirects and headers move to a dashboard feature called Web Rules, and sites that depend on Apache rules need care before switching.
Cloudways released Lightning to all customers in November 2025. Existing applications were not moved automatically, and Cloudways' help centre still describes Hybrid as the default for new applications, so many sites are running on the older stack without their owners having made a choice. This guide explains what changes, what the published numbers show, and how to switch safely.
Lightning vs Hybrid: what is different
On the Hybrid stack, a request passes through NGINX, which serves static files and hands dynamic requests to Varnish, a page cache, which passes uncached requests on to Apache, which runs PHP and reads .htaccess. That chain is flexible, because any WordPress plugin can drop rules into .htaccess, but each layer costs time and memory.
On the Lightning Stack, NGINX passes PHP requests straight to PHP-FPM, and Apache and its .htaccess handling are gone. NGINX is event-driven, so it handles many simultaneous connections with less memory than Apache. The gain shows up most on requests no cache can answer: WordPress admin screens, carts, checkouts, searches and logged-in pages. Breeze, Redis and Object Cache Pro work on both stacks.
| Feature | Hybrid stack | Lightning Stack |
|---|---|---|
| Web servers | NGINX in front of Apache | NGINX only |
| Varnish page cache | Yes | Not used |
| .htaccess support | Yes | No |
| Redirects and headers | .htaccess, or a plugin | Web Rules in the dashboard, or a plugin |
| Uncached request handling | Slower | Faster |
What the benchmarks show
Cloudways publishes its own comparison: a WordPress site on a DigitalOcean Premium server with 4 vCPUs and 8 GB of RAM, with Varnish, Redis and caching plugins all switched off, loaded with up to 1,000 simulated visitors over 30 minutes who browsed, logged in and visited pages. Hybrid served 255,190 requests with a 95th-percentile response time of 5.7 seconds. Lightning served 394,437 requests with a 95th-percentile time of 4.6 seconds, and average page responses dropped from 3.6 seconds to 2.7.
Cloudways also cites an independent benchmark by Koddr.io showing Lightning completing 58% more WooCommerce checkouts and up to 65% faster uncached response times. Treat both as vendor-supplied: the tests deliberately remove caching to isolate the stack, and your site will see a smaller difference on pages that are cached. The direction, though, matches what NGINX-only set-ups do elsewhere, and the biggest gains land on the pages that are hardest to speed up any other way.
What stops working without .htaccess
Lightning does not read .htaccess at all, and it does not warn you about rules it is ignoring. Check for these before switching:
- Redirects written in .htaccess, such as old URLs from a previous site structure, or forcing a trailing slash. They need rebuilding as Web Rules or in a redirect plugin.
- Security plugin rules. Some WordPress security plugins block access to files or set firewall rules through .htaccess. On Lightning those protections quietly disappear.
- Browser caching and compression rules that caching plugins add to .htaccess. NGINX handles compression itself, but custom cache headers need re-creating as Web Rules.
- Password-protected folders and IP blocks set in .htaccess.
- Non-WordPress applications that rely on Apache modules or complex rewrite logic.
The standard WordPress .htaccess block, the one that makes pretty permalinks work, is not a problem: Lightning handles WordPress routing itself. Laravel's default public/.htaccess is likewise not needed on Lightning.
Web Rules and their limits
Web Rules live in each application's settings and come in two kinds. Header rules add, change or remove response headers, such as security headers or cache-control, with up to 10 per application. Redirect and rewrite rules send requests elsewhere with a 301 or 302, or rewrite them internally, with up to 25 per application. Each rule has one condition, which can use a regular expression.
Cloudways says its analysis of more than 100,000 sites found Web Rules cover 80 to 90% of real-world .htaccess use. For a typical site that is right. A site migrating from an old platform with hundreds of URL redirects needs either a WordPress redirect plugin, which works on any stack, or the Hybrid stack. There is no option to write your own NGINX configuration instead; it is a feature request Cloudways has not delivered.
How to switch an application to Lightning
- Copy your .htaccess file over SFTP and read it. Note every rule that is not the standard WordPress block.
- Create a staging copy of the application. The stack is set per application, so you can switch the staging copy on its own.
- Switch the staging copy. Open Application Settings, choose the Stack tab, select Lightning Stack, click Update Now and confirm.
- Rebuild the rules you need as Web Rules on the staging copy, and test redirects, logins, forms, the cart and any protected areas.
- Switch the live application the same way, recreate the Web Rules there, and clear Breeze and any CDN cache.
For many applications at once, the dashboard's "Switch to Lightning Stack" button lets you pick a server and tick several applications. Use it only for sites you have already checked. If something breaks after switching, set the application back to Hybrid from the same Stack tab. Our staging guide covers creating and pushing the staging copy.
Should you stay on Hybrid?
Stay on Hybrid if your site depends on .htaccess logic you cannot easily move, uses Apache-specific modules, or has more redirects than Web Rules allow and you would rather not add a plugin. Hybrid is still supported, and Varnish still gives it a fast page cache for logged-out visitors.
For everything else, and especially for WooCommerce, membership sites and busy admin areas, Lightning is the better default on Cloudways. Pair it with Redis and the caching set-up in our WordPress speed guide, and read the Cloudways review for how the stack fits into the rest of the platform.
More in Hosting & cloud
See the whole sectorCloudways vs Kamatera: managed hosting or your own server?
Cloudways vs Kamatera: a managed WordPress and PHP platform from $24/mo against a configurable unmanaged server from $4/mo. Root, cost, trials and fit.
Cloudways root access: what you can and can't change
Cloudways root access is not available on any plan. Why, what the master SSH user can still do, which packages you can install, and when to host elsewhere.
Cloudways Cloudflare Enterprise review: is $4.99 worth it?
Cloudways Cloudflare Enterprise add-on reviewed: $4.99 per domain, a 30-day trial that converts to paid, what it adds over Cloudflare's free plan, and set-up.
Adam Ferris
Cloud & Infrastructure Writer · The Comparer
Spent a few years keeping servers online at an ad-tech company that doesn't exist anymore. Rents GPU time the way other people rent power tools.
Readers also opened
Bento user reviews: Trustpilot vs Reddit
What Bento users say on Trustpilot (4.6 stars) versus Reddit, and why the two disagree. Our own verdict is in the full Bento review.
AWeber review 2026: is it still worth using?
AWeber has been sending automated emails since before Gmail existed. We spent weeks in the dashboard to see how it holds up against its 2026 competition.
Jotform review 2026: when it earns its keep
Forms, e-signatures, approval chains, even AI agents: where Jotform pulls its weight, where the usage caps start to bite, and whether the paid tiers are worth it.
Jotform pricing: Bronze vs Silver vs Gold
Everything you need to know about submission limits, payment quotas, signed document caps, and when you are forced into Enterprise.
Cloudways review 2026: what $11 to $99 a month gets you
Cloudways review: managed cloud hosting from $11/mo on DigitalOcean. What you get, real costs, no root access, and who should pick something else.
Kamatera review 2026: flexible cloud VPS with caveats
Kamatera starts at $4/mo with 30 days free, but it is unmanaged infrastructure. What the money buys, what it does not, and the billing rules that catch people.
Rewrite Bento's AI pitch so it sounds like you
Why the out-of-the-box AI pitch gets ignored, and a simple four-part structure for rewriting it so it actually sounds like you wrote it.
How to build an automated welcome sequence in AWeber
A walkthrough for setting up sign-up tags, a five-email nurture sequence, and automatic PDF delivery so new subscribers hear from you right away.
Jotform vs Google Forms: why pay $39 a month?
A practical look at exactly where free Google Forms stops being enough, and where paying for dedicated workflow software starts making sense.
Bento for UGC creators: past the $150 gig
The economics of UGC work, who to actually pitch, and how a few creators have turned one-off videos into repeat monthly retainers.
How to find the right person to pitch at a brand
A walkthrough of Bento's search filters — niche, region, and the specific job titles worth targeting, from Influencer Marketing Manager to Head of Growth.
Is AWeber okay with affiliate marketing?
Many email platforms suspend accounts the moment they spot an affiliate link. Here's where AWeber draws the line, and how to stay well inside it.